As a marketer, when I think of data being collected on customers, I’ve usually thought of it in a positive light. That is, if it’s helping the marketer tailor service or product offerings to the needs and preferences of specific customers without being intrusive. Though it’s becoming increasingly difficult to tell where that line falls. One person may think targeted ads based on web surfing habits is helpful and unobtrusive whereas another may think it’s appalling.
There is a basic threshold of responsibility when you voluntarily give sensitive information to a company. Unfortunately, even this basic threshold is often not met when a company loses your personal information due to a security breach. Just recently, I received an email from Manhattan GMAT alerting me that the credit card information I had on file with them was compromised. My first thought when reading this was why they would still have my credit card information on file with them? I took a GMAT prep course with them back in the fall of 2009. In general, I would think the repeat business for test prep companies is not terribly high, so why would they still deem it necessary to keep my information on file years after the payment was processed?
The fact that I had no idea my information would be stored for so long got me thinking about what onus there is on the consumer to make sure their data is safeguarded. When I go back to the Manhattan GMAT website to read their privacy policy, I’m actually relieved to find a one page policy of fairly easily understandable terms. Perhaps most importantly, they promise not to share any data collected with third party entities. Growing up in the age of ecommerce, I usually never read privacy policies. I just check the box and proceed with my transaction either because I’m impatient or I don’t even understand the legalese in it. Take Apple's privacy policy for example. It's quite a bit longer, and while most of it easily understood by the average person, it is a bit more daunting to really get what all of it could mean. All of the location-based information collected is done so under the guise that Apple is improving services for you, and supposedly that information is anonymous. One can't help but think that with the abundance of other information out there, your identity could be pieced together.I agree that any competent adult is responsible for taking steps to protect their personal information and opting out of sharing choices. Many services such as Facebook or Twitter are free and one could argue that if you don’t agree with their privacy policies, you can always just not use them. While that’s true, there becomes a critical mass factor for Facebook now that its user base is over 500 million. It becomes nearly necessary to be active on Facebook to be considered a normal functioning person in society. I know many people, especially in marketing or branding functions, who must be on Twitter. To find a job and network, it’s crucial that you be on LinkedIn. It’s not easy to give up any of these things is you want to be social and progress in your career. So are we just at the mercy of whatever these companies decide to do with our data? I can’t picture a scenario where a big enough group of people would rise up and boycott one of these companies for going too far with exposing data. I fully support each company’s right to monetize through information posted, but I do not support selling data that is anything less than anonymous to a third party. It seems logical that government regulation is the next line of defense that ordinary citizens have against these companies. Unfortunately, due to that lag effect, we as informed consumers must continue to ask questions and put pressure on them to keep our personal data private.